Sunday, August 7, 2011

NEW “APES” STANDS TALL

RISE OF THE PLANET OF THE APES
Starring James Franco,
Andy Serkis,
Freida Pinto,
John Lithgow,
Brian Cox,
Tom Felton,
David Oyelowo
Directed by Rupert Wyatt
Written by Rick Jaffa, Amanda Silva
Suggested by the novel by Pierre Boulle
Running time 103 mins.
Rated PG-13





          Could just be one of the best sci-fi movies ever. That said, I don’t think of “Rise of the Planet of the Apes” as a prequel so much as a highly revolutionary “prequel.” In quotes. Certainly there could be no advantage in watching this film, followed by all the rest in order. It would be about as weird as trying to do that with the Star Wars movies.
          The only real reason to call it a prequel is to tie it in with the pre-existing franchise because marketing says that’s what works.
          However, there is a very good reason why this film can’t properly be considered a prequel, and I’ll say what it is without spoiling anything, unless you don’t know how the original “Planet of the Apes” ends: When Charlton Heston pounds the sand and cries, “You did it! Oh, you actually did it!” (or thereabouts), he’s referring to the bomb. His character laments that man was stupid enough for nuclear war, and that out of dropping the bomb evolution took a new direction with the apes taking over. But this movie has none of that.
          Upshot: A scientist (Franco) with the cure for Alzheimer’s raises a chimpanzee test-ape called Caesar who, due to exposure to the drug, exhibits uncanny intelligence with potentially catastrophic consequences.
          What makes this movie work so well is the degree of authenticity. No other cinematic manner of presenting the proper believability has ever been possible until now. Until “Avatar,” anyway.
          That said, good as it is, no, it isn’t perfect. Although some of the digipanzees do look realistic enough to fool about anybody, I suppose. If watching a chimp or gorilla walk around upright–and these things are available on YouTube–kind of makes you wince in revulsion, you’ll love this one.
          The filmmakers simply do a damn good job of making the story look possible. Sort of like “Jurassic Park.” And they do it so much that we can forgive the excesses. Fact is, I’ll bet, there just aren’t that many chimps, gorillas, and orangutans in the Bay Area or any other area that could all band together in such huge cinematic numbers.
          Andy Serkis’ performance as Caesar is exceptional. As with Gollum and King Kong, Andy performs in digital getup, so we never see his face. But the eyes, the facial expressions, all the movement, and everything in the digital clothing is Andy, and it is his performance that brings out Caesar’s humanity.
          Naturally there are the requisite homage moments. A memorable line or two cleverly incorporated–a 3D puzzle of the Statue of Liberty, a TV on with Charlton Heston.
          Terrific presentation all around, and an understated performance by James Franco, who manages to make some fairly fantastic subject matter actually seem believable.
          So far, for the summer, right behind satisfying must-sees “Harry Potter” and “Pirates of the Caribbean,” we have “Super 8,” “Cowboys and Aliens,” and “Rise of the Planet of the Apes,” with “Rise” being probably just slightly the best of the latter three.

Monday, August 1, 2011

“COWBOYS AND ALIENS” MASH A SMASH

COWBOYS AND ALIENS
Starring Daniel Craig,
Harrison Ford,
Abigail Spencer,
Paul Dano,
Adam Beach,
Sam Rockwell,
Noah Ringer,
Keith Carrdine
Directed by Jon Favreau
Written by Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzmann, Damon Lindelof,
Mark Fergus, Hawk Otsby
Based on a screen story by Mark Fergus, Hawk Otsby, Steve Oedekerk
Based on a Platinum Studios comic book by Scott Mitchell Rosenberg
Running time 118 mins.
Rated PG-13






          The number one surprise with “Cowboys and Aliens” is how not campy it is. If you don’t expect any buddy movie banter between the leads, you’ll have a smoother time, too. “Men in Black” in sage brush, “Cowboys and Aliens” ain’t.
          Upshot: Lean, mean Wanted Man cowboy (Craig) in Wild West times has a wound in his side and a weird, outer space-y device on his wrist, and won’t cow tow to the son of the richest man (Ford) in the dirty little town. This gets him into more trouble, and along the way, aliens show up. Aliens what need gittin’.
          It makes for an interesting mash-up. Sort of “3:10 to Yuma” meets “District 9" in the serious-looking Western mixed with bipedal, monstrous aliens.
          I don’t know that it’s really the right role for Harrison Ford, though. He doesn’t play the unlikeable guy very well. I think he knows that audiences see him permanently associated with Indiana Jones and Han Solo, and so he consciously chooses roles to go against that type. And he’s a good enough actor that he can do it. But there are lots of other actors who could play the role without being quite so distracting.
          Or maybe I was distracted more by expectations from the poster. It looks like Butch and Sundance, just the two of them. But the movie’s nothing like that. Not the big buddy festival at all.
          And a darn fine supporting cast, too. The dude that Daniel Day-Lewis slaps around in “There Will Be Blood” plays the son here quite memorably. Another guy, the Luca Brasi-ish thick skull in “The Departed,” is perfect as the rising Irish bandit leader.
          But it’s the lack of cutesiness one finds so startlingly refreshing. It is entirely unique in film to see so earnest a Western with trippy, bug-like UFO aliens leapin’ around, killin’ folk.
          “Tremors” and “Eight-Legged Freaks” are similarly campy yet slightly hardcore. “Cowboys and Aliens” is nothing like that.
          It’s not a great Western. And it’s not standout sci-fi. But somehow “Cowboys and Aliens” really is a great movie because playing it so serious gives it quite the quirky tone.
          Well worth checking out.